Anything goes: now the financial system secrets will be rocked


As we all are seen, transparency is not the only effect that the leaks have had until now. Much the opposite who felt affected by it fought back with every single available weapon. Assange is only still alive because he is savvy enough to have established an insurance policy with much more heavy duty information. For instance the hint (the real threat of revealing Bank of America’s and other financial institutions real state-of-affairs) is not an empty threat but something that will come along… perhaps bit by bit but is in the making.

The truth of the matter is there is not a single government on the face of the planet that is not dirty and smeared with plenty of sh*t under their shoes and sometimes in their faces. Zapatero (Spain Prime Minister) in spite of his “independent and transparent” discourse has offered a gigantic military base for military operations to the U.S.A. to control North Africa from Spain; Lula brave’s anti-imperialist discourse “went to Washington for Bush’s blessing before taking office”; Berlusconi… well, why bother with him?

Governments are dirty by essence and cannot be another way. The oligarchies and the politicians are the real patriots, they love the countries in which they are powerful, above the laws (although not publicly) and hold the economic fictitious system. The middle class is oblivious to the real world we live in. The lower classes have a better sense of the real world given the dispossession of basics make real consciousnesses arise.

Financial System

Nevertheless, it is from the illustrated ranges of the middle class where the leaks and the hackers come from and with the rage which only the youth have they are shouting from the depth of the Internet world: “we are up to you and we are going to get you”. Can the U.S. or anyone as a matter of fact win the battle against an army of well educated, tech-savvy and the majority digital natives? I doubt it. As I have said some days ago, the depression started with smart asses and it is just beginning, not ending. The leaks and the tremendous outrages the government counter-actions have taken are provoking the unthinkable: hackers are up with their tools to bring down the banking system, the credit card companies and Internet fortunes that are willing to obey the central intelligence services (because they already belong to the oligarchy themselves) and try to shut the leaks out of the map. These realities are here to stay: leaks shall leaks, liars shall try to shut down the leaks (present and futures) and hackers (middle class upper echelon, never too much to remark) are going to fight back, from anywhere to everywhere.

DONATION PLEASE!

Brazil, capitalism managed by Marxists: a history of success


In December 2003, almost one year after the labor leader Lula da Silva had reached the Presidency of Brazil I was in the V.I.P area of Sao Paulo’s Airport and I met a very cultivated man who worked in a high rank position in a Brazilian bank, owned by one of the most tradition old money families of the country and we had a nice conversation given that both flights were delayed. Typically Brazilian airport sign: delayed or cancelled.

As the conversation went on, he felt more at easy after knowing that I didn’t live there and start to speak the secrets from the guts of the new regime. Yeah, in reality a new “regime” was in the making and I knew from my student’s activist time the players, the new rulers very well: formed in the schools of Moscow, Beijing and lately in Tirana (yes, old communist Albania). Now they were the government of one of the biggest and richest countries on the planet with the most cynical, cruel and frivolous bourgeoisie I know in the world. How the country was supposed to function given the huge class gap between the poor, middle class and the rich? According to this brand new source I met the deal was done in the beginning of 2002 between the Worker’s Party (Lula’s party), the FEBRABAN (Brazilian Bank Federation) and FIESP (the powerful industrials union of Sao Paulo). Lula pledged allegiance to the establishment.

The deal was that that as long as the Worker’s Party did not move with the basics of the model: private property, banking system and the Justice (a mockery of justice itself) and Parliamentarian structure (a huge pocket of corrupted representatives) and refrain the worker’s labor unions (all them under his parties control) from more aggressive positions against the dominant class, and they would not prevent the very possible election of “the guy” as Obama referred to Lula in a recent meeting in Washington.

Real x Dollar

Real x Dollar


The “guy” was elected and inherited a brutal crisis from his predecessor but that crisis was mainly the overlap of 2001’s recession which spilled into 2002 and the banking system (national and international) did not lose the opportunity to profit from the uncertainty of the new government and speculated heavily against the real (local currency) and the stock markets. That brought them a gigantic profit as never before. The real had reached 4 to 1 US dollar. Today, ending 2010, it struggles to not go lower than 1.50 real/dollar.

Strikes were over, the “farmer’s without land” movement was appeased by some government innocuous and false promises, and mainly Lula started to elaborate a huge alliance with the opposition parties in order to have majority in the Congress and be able to govern. He didn’t touch the privatizations done by the former president neither the profit remittance of the multinationals. He bought with money thru a complicated embezzlement scheme managed by his old time companion José Dirceu, who managed the feared “Casa Civil” the necessary support in Congressmen votes. Vote by vote, billions of dollars changed hands and so the country started to “stabilize”. The Minister of the “Casa Civil” is a sort of unofficial prime minister who concentrates an enormous power in his/her hands. He gathered the majority of Congress deputies from a myriad of parties ranging from ideological peers to life time right-wingers enemies. Capitalism’s magic with a Marxist touch applied to it.

As a whistleblower brought down the scheme almost all the Ministries (all occupied by old time communists and right-wing “partners of the bribery scheme), Dilma Rousseff, elected 11/01/2010 President of the country, assumed the post of Minister of “Casa Civil” and commanded from there her way up. Plenty of corruption is administered directly inside that Ministry. All other Ministries are subordinated to the “Casa Civil”. Dilma Rousseff also comes from a terrible past of totalitarian ideology and guerrilla warfare. But who cares? Certainly not the bankers and industrials let alone the dispossessed.

Bolsa Familia

Bolsa Familia


“As never before in the history of this country…” became a popular joke because Lula used this phrase 8 out of 10 times when discoursing thru the country. He perfected a scheme of high carbs, high cholesterol and a minimum of vitamins and proteins called “Bolsa Familia”: basic ration diet distributed to 11 million families all over the country. In the miserable areas of the North and Northeast he became second to God, in some areas ranking above Jesus himself. Never before in the history of that country, had a government given out plain, disgusting rations to the poor. Never before in the history of that country had profits been so high that the 2008 crisis merely missed the country in the world map. Obama should have spent more time with that illiterate politician in order to learn how to do little and seem to do too much at the same time.
Communist Flag

Communist Flag


Corruption, disguised party control of all regulatory agencies, freedom of enterprise combined with generous subsidies to the rich and bread crumbs to the poor plus a shift in the defining standards of what is the middle class who was terribly crushed in the meantime made the dominance of the elite of the old communists the most popular government of Brazilian history and that makes me wonder. Brazil is a salvage capitalist country governed by Marxists in democratic outfits. China is a communist country governed by technocrats formed in the best schools in the Capitalist West and both countries share in common a terrific economic growth, corruption, social unfairness and divisions, crisis become a foreign concept in both lands. Meanwhile, in the USA an intellectual president (but a bad politician)and a highly self-confident educated class lost 11/02/2010 elections to the corrupted Republicans and Europe is held hostage of economical paralysis although it is governed by a highly illustrated capitalist elite. What is wrong with this big picture?
Lula Ahmadinejad

Lula Ahmadinejad


Anyway, Dilma Rousseff was elected the first female president of Brazil (macho land where macho men dress-up in women’s clothes during carnival and behave more gaily than gays); she has never held a single political elected office; she is educated but believes firmly that only the party can guide “the people”; she is Lula’s puppet and will have some problems: Lula is a friend of Ahmadinejad (Iran’s President) and Brazil has established cooperation agreements with that country that execute women.
Lula and Dilma

Lula and Dilma

Will she bow to her old boss (Lula) and dress a Niqab veil covering her proud liberated woman’s face to receive Ahmadinejad in his next visit to Brazilian soil? She went on her whole life defending the right of women’s choice and denied in order to get religious votes… Pragmatism and dogmas. Maybe that is the exit to the current crisis nevertheless the real dose of cynicism to be applied remains a mystery few have mastered.

The two sides of the same coin


Lula, the self acclaimed “new third world leader” has warmly received against the will of the majority of the Brazilian people who has literacy enough to understand what and where Iran is, his “comrade” from Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

“If Iran is an important actor in this discord, then it is important that someone sits with Iran, talks with Iran and tries to establish a balancing point, so that society returns to a certain normality in the Middle East,” said Lula according the NYT and all the international press.

So, finally, we can see how an ignorant, arrogant and definitely an opportunist low politician as Lula (yes, he sure is low and dirty with a legendary history of treason amongst his native “comrades) drops the mask of being “the guy”, acclaimed by the ingenuity of Obama in a G-20 Summit and shows that he has no limits to his ambitions of being a “world leader”.

Brazilians Protesting the Visit

The visit of Iran’s dictator is an embarrassment to millions of Brazilian women, homosexuals, Brazilian Jewish and all democrats in general but a chance to show that in the dirty game of power at any cost, Lula wins by far. By being a hypocrite, unscrupulous “comrade” who embraces one of the most sanguinary and disgusting person who ever lived? Hopefully, this will help to show the real nature of the beast.

Obama, please be careful before saying that anyone is “the guy” once again. Everybody, be aware that “the guy” has long knives as another Austrian popular politician who dominated Germany did have back in the 30’s and is no saint at all.

Lula, the pacifier! It’s laughable coming from the man who cannot pacify the favelas (slums) of Rio de Janeiro.

PS: A person carrying the Rainbow Flag inside the conference hall where the Iranian dictator is staying has been arrested by the Brazilian Federal Police. The Jewish community has been barred from the press conferences. Supposedly due to the lack of security to the dictator, the conference was called off at 23:17 GMT. The Brazilian Presidency denied it but Lula reaffirmed the support for “pacific use” of nuclear energy by Iran.

Online Content Production: the law of silence


While pushing forward the endeavour of gathering information from all sources to follow the series of articles relating to State provided subsidies, I have tumbled against a wall made out of tough steel and concrete: silence. If was my purpose to question policy makers, directors of audiovisual institutions, institutes of cinematography as well as filmmakers, directors, producers, distributors, actors, etc .etc.

The task would not be easy to start; I suspected that already, but with rare exceptions I was rebuffed as if I were a thief or at least a poisonous threat to the status quo of their jobs and life earnings. Without going further naming names, Cultural Authorities of different European States and Latin American countries, after reading (or not) this small blog, simply denied flatly to give any sort of interview by email, phone or whatever means offered. The position is that the law is the law and questioning these laws is unlawful. Waving the flag of the law as if those had no relation whatsoever to the reality and fairness to the people. I have to remind these ladies and gentlemen that once upon a time, slavery was also lawful and it was unlawful to question it. Would anyone dare to do it now?

Few producers came forward (some of them bravely offering to make their names and positions public) but yet, the absolutely majority simply would not discuss the issues of digital distribution, subsidies for online production and the new reality of content production for the Internet (broadband) era. No interest for pretty obvious reasons.

But why all the fear and self imposed law of silence? What evil can be brought upon humanity to talk about what is already reality, a given fact?

In order to clarify the situation, to open a call for all the interested parts to answer questions the society itself is posing and the public authorities and the others refusing to answer, I’ve decided to make public the questions I sent to them. Four simple questions that remain without answers:

1) Considering that the numbers of online viewers of audiovisual contents multiply, at least, ten times the number of movie theatres audiences in each and every country, is it fair to have the State (which should represent the interests of the people) subsidise film productions with a non-negotiable condition that the films shall be presented and released in movie theatres?

2) Why do you insist to impose criteria that are not up-to-date with the public’s interests ignoring their own culture consumption habits?

3) While audiovisual works available for free to all users are ignored by the public authorities and denied subsidies while audiovisual works intended for theatre or TV releases which constitute under all lights the construction of private propriety (copyright and commercial exploitation) with public funds- continues to be hailed by the state cultural authorities as the only valid option. Don’t you plan to revaluate this unfair situation and leverage to the real world situation of the cultural consumers of your respective countries introducing a fair system of public subsidies?

4) The public has the right to decide when, how and which cultural product wish to use. And in fact, they have done it already. Don’t you consider that the public funds spent in cultural production must reflect the public demand? And given that situation, leverage the social players in fairness, namely the creators/authors/producers of online content?

It is absolutely comprehensible that people will ignore reality as far as they see it possible in order to keep their own status and privileges. My question is: until when will possible to remain in denial?

  • Calendar

    • July 2017
      M T W T F S S
      « Dec    
       12
      3456789
      10111213141516
      17181920212223
      24252627282930
      31  
  • Search